找到帮助您将学生对等评估合并到课程中。这些工具分类为1）当学生审查彼此的工作时使用的工具和2）当学生在集团工作的背景下审查彼此的表现时使用的那些。LT HUB推荐的所有工具都通过了UBCPrivacy Impact Assessmentand receive central technical and pedagogical support.
学生对审查工作的同行评估
UBC集中支持四个学生对等级评估工具，可以促进您有学生审查，评分和/或留下彼此的工作反馈的作业。
General Tips
- 在规划任务时，请咨询教学，学习和技术中心student peer assessment resources for instructors and studentsorbook a one-on-one consultation有关其他指导。
- 通读使用学生同行评估的案例来自其他UBC教练
- Include clear and detailed assessment criteria for students to ensure more consistency between different reviewers.
- Have students practice with 3-4 sample assignments that have already been assessed by an expert (e.g., you) using the same criteria they will be using.
- 与学生交谈您使用对等评估的原因in your course, to reduce their anxiety in being assessed and assessing their peers.
Compare the tools
比较主要特征四个中央支持的学生对同行评估工具，用于评估同伴工作的学生在UBC。
| Criteria | 帆布 | 克拉斯 | 合格 | 分贝 |
| What are the strengths? |
|
|
|
|
| 有什么限制？ |
|
|
|
|
| 帆布 | 克拉斯 | 合格 | 分贝 | |
| 完成的工作peers? | ||||
| 他们自己的工作？ | ||||
| 对同龄人的反馈？ | ||||
| In what format(s) can students submit work for review? | 文本， images, 视频， audio, 方程式， PDFs |
Images, 视频， audio, PDFs |
文本， images, 视频， audio, 方程式， PDFs |
文本， images, 视频， audio, PDFS， programming code |
| 帆布 | 克拉斯 | 合格 | 分贝 | |
| Who can submit work for review? | 个人， groups |
Individuals | 个人， groups |
个人， groups |
| In what ways can students provide feedback? | 评论框， 注释（在PDF，Word Doc，PowerPoint或Image）， instructor-set rubrics (multiple-choice questions) |
Comment box (may include video or audio), annotations (on video, audio, image, or PDF) |
评论框， 讲师集rubrics（答案对之间选择的问题） |
评论框， annotations (only on text), instructor-set rubrics (question types include: multiple choice, slider, matrix, dropdown, checkbox, scale, points), file attachment |
| How can students be assigned reviews? | 随机或手动分配 | Not assigned (students must be instructed which work to review) |
随机分配 | 随机分配 |
| Do student assessments result in a numeric value calculated by the tool? | ||||
| Can students review without knowing who they review? | (feedback must also be anonymous) |
|||
| Can students receive feedback without knowing who it is from? | (reviewing must also be anonymous) |
| 帆布 | 克拉斯 | 合格 | 分贝 | |
| 可以生成一个成绩，没有教师的任何额外步骤？ | (grades must be entered manually) |
(grades must be entered manually) |
（参与为基础） |
(rubric-based and/or 参与的） |
| 可以从工具传递到画布等级册吗？ | (once configured, participation grades will be passed) |
（单击Peerscholar中的按钮手动启动同步） |
Read about the tools
Cost for use:
None
带宽需求：
Low（速度速度连接不应影响基本访问）
Fippa符合要求的要求使用：
None
帆布Peer Review
Facilitate simple student peer assessments in Canvas.
What are the benefits?
- 帆布Peer Review applies a streamlined use of peer review that can be relatively quick to set up.
- If you’re already using Canvas, these assignments will happen in a familiar interface for you and your students.
- 您可以手动分配每个对等体会审核的工作。
Cost for use:
None
带宽需求：
High(a slow Internet connection may impact access)
Fippa符合要求的要求使用：
None
CLA（协作学习注释系统）
Add granular peer review to multimedia like videos and images.
What are the benefits?
- CLA允许对等体以交互方式审查多媒体，如图像，视频和PDF。
- 您可以使用学生使用上下文评论和注释讨论多媒体。您还可以使用相同的工具查看自己的工作。
- 除了文本之外，还可以使用音频或视频给出反馈。
Cost for use:
None
带宽需求：
Low（速度速度连接不应影响基本访问）
Fippa符合要求的要求使用：
None
合格
让学生比较和评论成对呈现的同伴工作。
What are the benefits?
- Looking at pairs of work helps students identify strengths and weaknesses of each individual work using their innate comparative judgement.
- You can have the tool pair work adaptively, so pairs are selected based on similar quality.
- 最后，学生可以看到所有对同行的对比进行更广泛的比较。
分贝分贝
Ask students to review work, as well as review the feedback they receive, using highly flexible rubrics.
What are the benefits?
- 自定义允许您设置学生响应的标准以及格式以及设置最终等级的计算方式。
- 您可以通过让学生查看他们收到或提交他们的工作修订的对等反馈来包括其他学习机会。
- 学生可以给出不同的“案例”（说明），然后审查与自己的案例相同或不同。
审查团队合作的学生同行评估
UBC集中支持两个学生同行评估工具，邀请学生评估对方对分组和团队合作的贡献。
General Tips
- 在规划任务时，请咨询教学，学习和技术中心student peer assessment resources for instructors and studentsorbook a one-on-one consultation有关其他指导。
- Using student peer assessments formatively can help students understand how their contributions are perceived early on and make changes, if needed, before final summative assessments.
- 学生审查可以指导您为小组项目或其他合作分配更公平的个人成绩，以及在群体工作时提升对学生的问责制。
Compare the tools
比较的主要功能two centrally-supported student peer assessment tools for students assessing teamwork在UBC。
| Criteria | ipeer. | 分贝 |
| What are the strengths? |
|
|
| 有什么限制？ |
|
|
| ipeer. | 分贝 | |
| Teamwork skills of peers? | ||
| Their own teamwork skills? |
| ipeer. | 分贝 | |
| In what ways can students provide feedback? | 评论框， instructor-set rubrics (multiple-choice questions), 点分布 |
评论框， instructor-set rubrics (question types include: multiple choice, slider, matrix, dropdown, checkbox, scale, points) |
| Do student assessments result in a numeric value calculated by the tool? | ||
| Can students receive feedback without knowing who it is from? | ||
| Can students receive feedback knowing who it is from? |
| ipeer. | 分贝 | |
| 可以生成一个成绩，没有教师的任何额外步骤？ | (rubric-based) |
(rubric-based and/or 参与的） |
| 可以从工具传递到画布等级册吗？ | （单击IPEER中的按钮手动启动同步） |
（单击Peerscholar中的按钮手动启动同步） |
Read about the tools
ipeer.ipeer.
创建学生用来匿名审查他们在此UBC开发的工具中的小组成员进行评估的团队合作。
What are the benefits?
- You can set custom rubrics for students to use in review or have each student divvy up a set number of points.
- 可以立即为学生设置评论。
- Assessments can be coordinated with any groups you’ve already set up in Canvas.
分贝
创建学生用来匿名地使用此工具中的功能匿名查看其组成员的自定义rubrics，这些功能也可以促进工作的评估。
What are the benefits?
- 您可以使用高度灵活性设置对等评审。
- 同行评审结果和最终等级可以多种方式计算。
- Assessments can be coordinated with groups or assignments you’ve already set up in peerScholar.